Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1363

reference
200-tree-1
name
1363
tree-preservation-order

undefined

200-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.026662 50.865080)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.026591 50.865072,-1.026594 50.865086,-1.026604 50.865099,-1.026619 50.865109,-1.026639 50.865116,-1.026661 50.865118,-1.026683 50.865116,-1.026703 50.865110,-1.026719 50.865100,-1.026729 50.865088,-1.026733 50.865074,-1.026730 50.865060,-1.026720 50.865047,-1.026704 50.865037,-1.026685 50.865031,-1.026663 50.865028,-1.026641 50.865030,-1.026621 50.865036,-1.026605 50.865046,-1.026595 50.865059,-1.026591 50.865072)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL